Quantum Gravity

Logic Realism Theory extends naturally to questions at the intersection of quantum mechanics and gravity. While full derivations remain future work, $L_3$ constraints provide principled guidance on deep puzzles.

The Black Hole Information Paradox

The problem: Hawking radiation is thermal (carries no information). If black holes evaporate completely, information about what fell in appears to be destroyed—violating unitarity.

Standard approaches:

• Information is truly lost (violates quantum mechanics)
• Information is encoded in radiation correlations (holography)
• Information escapes through remnants or baby universes

LRT perspective: Information (identity-constituting structure) cannot be destroyed.

From the Identity Preservation theorem:

Therefore:

• Black hole evaporation must be unitary
• Information must escape, whether in Hawking radiation correlations or other mechanisms
• Singularities inside black holes cannot be genuine information-destroying endpoints

This aligns with AdS/CFT results, but LRT provides a logical reason rather than a holographic calculation.

Holographic Bounds

The Bekenstein bound states that maximum entropy (information content) of a region is proportional to its surface area in Planck units:

This implies roughly one bit per Planck area.

LRT interpretation: Distinguishability has a spatial density limit. There is a maximum number of bits (distinctions) per Planck area.

If $\hbar$ is the conversion factor between logical and physical structure:

(action = Planck constant × complexity in bits)

Then the Bekenstein bound follows naturally: physical regions have finite action capacity, hence finite bit capacity. The holographic principle reflects fundamental limits on distinguishability density.

Measurement in Quantized Spacetime

The measurement problem in quantum gravity asks: What constitutes a measurement when spacetime itself is quantized?

Standard QM assumes a classical spacetime background. But if spacetime is quantized:

• What are the “macroscopic” records that enforce $L_3$?
• Where is the boundary between quantum superposition and classical definiteness?

LRT answer: Measurements occur when geometric configurations instantiate as $L_3$-admissible records.

The question is not “what is a measurement?” but “what configurations satisfy $L_3$ at the spacetime level?” Records must be:

• Determinately themselves (Id)
• Non-contradictory (NC)
• Complete with respect to relevant properties (EM)

The challenge is specifying this in a background-independent way.

Singularity Structure

Classical GR predicts singularities where:

• Curvature diverges
• Geodesics terminate
• The metric is undefined

LRT constraint: Singularities cannot destroy identity.

If a configuration reaches a singularity:

• Identity cannot simply vanish (violates Id)
• It must either persist or transform into a new configuration

This suggests:

1. Singularities are resolved at quantum scales (no genuine endpoints)
2. Singularities involve transformation (bouncing cosmologies, etc.)
3. Classical singularities are artifacts of incomplete physics

LRT does not determine which resolution is correct—but it constrains the space of possibilities.

Connections to Existing Programs

Causal set theory: Spacetime emerges from discrete causal relations. LRT’s “joint inadmissibility → ordering” is compatible but grounded in logic rather than discrete structure postulate.

Loop quantum gravity: Quantizes spacetime geometry directly. LRT asks: does LQG’s structure satisfy $L_3$ constraints?

String theory: Requires specific dimensions and structure. LRT might constrain which string vacua are $L_3$-admissible.

Open Questions

1. Relativistic formulation: How does $I_\infty$/$A_\Omega$ interface respect spacetime causal structure?

2. Background independence: Can $L_3$ constraints be formulated without assuming a background spacetime?

3. Cosmological implications: What does $L_3$ imply for initial conditions and the Big Bang?

4. Constant derivation: Can fundamental constants ($G$, $c$, $\hbar$) be derived from $L_3$?

Related Papers