Logic Realism Theory diagram showing the relationship between I∞ (representable configuration space), L₃ logical constraints (Identity, Non-Contradiction, Excluded Middle), and AΩ (admissible physical instantiation space) - deriving quantum structure from logical foundations

Logic Realism Theory

Physical Foundations from Logical Constraints

The Core Thesis

Logic Realism Theory (LRT) proposes that the three classical logical laws—Determinate Identity, Non-Contradiction, and Excluded Middle (collectively $L_3$)—function as ontological constraints on physical instantiation, not merely rules of inference. This approach to the logical foundations of physics offers an alternative to ontic structural realism by grounding quantum structure in logical admissibility rather than primitive physical relations.

The framework distinguishes:

This boundary condition generates quantum structure. Vehicle-invariance under mathematically equivalent decompositions forces the Born rule via Gleason’s theorem. Local tomography requirements select complex Hilbert space over real alternatives. The framework provides a derivation of the Born rule from first principles and addresses core problems in quantum ontology through logical constraints rather than postulates.

It from Bit, Bit from Fit: Physical structure emerges from informational structure, which emerges from logical admissibility.

The programme connects to broader questions in the philosophy of physics, offering novel predictions that distinguish it from interpretive competitors. The requirement for complex (rather than real) quantum mechanics was confirmed by Renou et al. (2021), providing empirical support for the logical realism approach.


Research Programme

LRT is a Lakatosian progressive research programme with:

The programme derives quantum structure rather than postulating it:

Result Derived From
Born rule ($|\psi|^2$) Vehicle-invariance (Determinate Identity)
Complex Hilbert space Local tomography requirement
Symmetrization postulate Identity constraints on identical particles
Tsirelson bound Hilbert space structure

Paper Suite

Position Paper

Core framework establishing $I_\infty$/$A_\Omega$ ontology, vehicle/content distinction, and the derivation of quantum structure from logical constraints.

January 2026 | Framework Foundation
Read Paper →

Born Rule Derivation

Derives the Born rule ($|\langle\phi|\psi\rangle|^2$) from vehicle-weight invariance via Gleason's theorem.

December 2025 | Technical Derivation
Read Paper →

Hilbert Space Derivation

Derives complex Hilbert space structure from Determinate Identity via local tomography requirements.

December 2025 | Technical Derivation
Read Paper →

QFT Statistics

Derives the symmetrization postulate (bosons/fermions) from Determinate Identity applied to identical particles.

December 2025 | Technical Extension
Read Paper →

Spacetime Extension

Explores consequences of Determinate Identity for spacetime structure: temporal ordering, Lorentzian signature, CTC exclusion.

December 2025 | Programmatic Extension
Read Paper →

It from Bit, Bit from Fit

Grounds Wheeler's "it from bit" in logical foundations. Quantum mechanics as the unique stable interface between $I_\infty$ and $A_\Omega$.

January 2026 | Conceptual Synthesis
Read Paper →

Information Circulation Hypothesis

The Information Circulation Hypothesis (ICH) extends LRT to cosmology: black hole horizons serve as $L_3$-instantiation boundaries where information de-actualizes (returns to $I_\infty$) and re-actualizes (joins $A_\Omega$). The net circulation imbalance produces an effective cosmological constant without fine-tuning.

ICH: Operationalization

The flagship ICH paper. Closes the L₃ → Adm gap via horizon physics. Makes assumptions explicit (A1-A5), derives Adm from boundary distinguishability constraints, connects to Λ as circulation fixed-point. JHEP/PRD ready.

February 2026 | Formal Treatment
Read Paper →

ICH: Conceptual Introduction

Accessible overview of the core idea: black holes as de-actualization mechanisms returning information to $I_\infty$. Start here for intuition before the formal treatment.

February 2026 | Background Reading
Read Article →

ICH: Numerical Exploration

Computational demonstration that influx/outflux imbalance produces $\Lambda$-like behavior ($w_\text{eff} \approx -1$) across broad parameter ranges without fine-tuning.

February 2026 | Computational Companion
Read Paper →

Simulations

ICH Dark Energy Notebooks

Toy simulations exploring how influx/outflux imbalance can drive late-time cosmic acceleration. Includes baseline model and parameter sensitivity analysis.

February 2026 | Computational Exploration
View Notebook →

Author

James (JD) Longmire

AI Assistance Disclosure: This work was developed with assistance from AI language models including Claude (Anthropic), ChatGPT (OpenAI), Gemini (Google), Grok (xAI), and Perplexity. All substantive claims, arguments, and errors remain the author’s responsibility. Human-Curated, AI-Enabled (HCAE).


Archives